sorted by

Date added

147 relationships, 68 entities

10 of 147 hubs

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
Indigenous Peoples FPIC Protocols
Library
Login

Info
147Relationships

PROTOCOLO AUTONOMO PUEBLO ARHUACO

Protocol

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I. OBJETO DEL PROTOCOLO AUTONOMO Y MANDATO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO-desde la Ley de Origeny el territorio ancestral y sagradode la Sierra Nevadade Santa Marta -SNSM -6
II. CONSIDERACIONES Y FUNDAMENTOS DEL PROTOCOLO AUTONOMO -MANDATO –DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO9
A. LA LEY DE ORIGEN–SEYN ZARE-PRINCIPIO RECTOR PARA LA PERVIVENCIA CULTURAL Y TERRITORIAL DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO9
1. LA LEY DE ORIGEN, SEYN ZARE; la vida surge desde la oscuridad9
2. LA VIDA DEL IKU Y DE OTROS SERES, El Guchu yÁnugwe10
3. SOBRE LAS CONDUCTAS PROHIBIDAS DESDE LA LEY DE ORIGEN11
4. MISIÓN DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO–el cuidado de la vida-12
B. MANDATO DE LOS PADRES ESPIRITUALES -KAKU JINA / ZAKU JINA-POR EL BIEN DE LOS PUEBLOS, SUS FUTURAS GENERACIONES Y LA VIDA DEL PLANETA. –La Sierra Nevadade Santa Marta como centro de las relaciones que permiten cumplir con los mandatos-14
1. LA LEY Y MANDATO DE CADA ELEMENTO COMO GUIA PARA LA TOMA DE DECISIONES.15
2. EL ORDEN NATURAL DEL TERRITORIO COMO ORDENADOR Y REGULADOR DE LAS PERSONAS Y SUS POBLADOS31
3. LOS CENTROS DE GOBIERNO ESPIRITUAL O ESPACIOS SAGRADOS: Mandato de los padres espirituales según su espacio, para cuidar y mantener la vida34
C. EL TIEMPO DESDE NUESTRACOSMOVISION 39
D. LA TERRITORIALIDAD DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO. 41
1. EL TERRITORIO ANCESTRAL DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO–Unidad de vida-41
2. LA LÍNEA NEGRA-SEYKUTUKUNUMAKU-DE LOS CUATRO PUEBLOS INDÍGENAS DE LA SIERRA NEVADADE SANTA MARTA; -espacio constitutivo del territorio ancestral-42
3. EL MAR Y SU INTEGRALIDAD AL TERRITORIO ANCESTRAL –LÍNEA NEGRA-DE LA SIERRA NEVADA44
4. JURISDICCION DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO-ÁREA DE CUIDADO CORRESPONDIENTE AL PUEBLO ARHUACODENTRO DE LA LÍNEA NEGRA-48
E. LA LEY DE ORIGENCOMO ORIENTADOR DEL SISTEMA DE AUTORIDAD Y GOBIERNO PROPIO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO4
1. LA AUTORIDAD ANCESTRAL,SU JURISDICCIÓN Y RESPONSABILIDADES 51
2. EL MAMU, MÁXIMA AUTORIDAD ESPIRITUAL52
3. CUIDAR Y MANTENER EL ÁNUGWE IKU EN EL TERRITORIO52
F. SISTEMA Y ESTRUCTURA DE GOBIERNO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO–55
1. FUNDAMENTO POLÍTICO –ORGANIZATIVO DEL GOBIERNO PROPIO55
2. ESTRUCTURA DE GOBIERNO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO; INSTANCIAS QUE ACTÚAN EN LA TOMA DE DECISIONES Y EN EL RELACIONAMIENTO CON TERCEROS58
3. INSTANCIAS POLÍTICO ADMINISTRATIVAS DE GOBIERNO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO63
4. INSTANCIAS DE INTERLOCUCIÓN DE LOS CUATRO PUEBLOS–para la toma de decisiones en asuntos que afecten el territorio ancestral y sagradodeU’munukunula Sierra Nevadade Santa Marta y que involucre a los cuatro pueblos-65
III. PRINCIPIOS RECTORES Y CRITERIOS PARA EL RELACIONAMIENTO Y EL DIÁLOGOINTERCULTURAL DEL PUEBLO ARHUACOCON TERCEROS –Incluyendo la Consulta y el Consentimiento previo, libre e informado-70
A. PRINCIPIOS RECTORES –para el relacionamiento con terceros-70
B. CRITERIOS GUÍA.-para el relacionamiento de terceros con el territorio ancestral y sagradode la SNSM y el Pueblo Arhuacoa tener en cuenta en la toma de decisiones durante el proceso de consulta previa, libre e informada79
1. CRITERIOS GENERALES –PARA ORIENTAR EL RELACIONAMIENTO CON LOS TERCEROS Y DE SUS ACTUACIONES DENTRO DEL TERRITORIO ANCESTRAL Y SAGRADODE LA SNSM-79
2. CRITERIOS PARA MANTENER ELKUNSAMU DEL AGUA-JE ZUKUNSAMU-, LA TIERRA -KA’GUMU-, EL FUEGO, EL AIRE, LOS ANIMALES, LA VEGETACIÓN Y LAS PERSONAS87
IV. PROCEDIMIENTOS PARA EL RELACIONAMIENTO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACOCON TERCEROS;LA CONSULTAPREVIA Y EL CONSENTIMIENTO PREVIO LIBRE E INFORMADO.94
A. CONSIDERACIONES PRELIMINARES94
1. LO QUE NO SE CONSULTA Y NO CUENTA CON EL CONSENTIMIENTO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO-obras y asuntos que no son objeto de consulta por estar en contra de la Ley de Origeny no son realizables en el territorio ancestral y sagradode la SNSM-. 94
2. DISPOSICIONES sobre algunas de las obras, proyectos que no cuentan con el consentimiento del Pueblo Arhuacoy están en funcionamiento.95
3. OTRAS ACTIVIDADES Y CONDUCTAS –PROHIBIDAS-QUE NO CUENTAN CON CONSENTIMIENTO EN EL TERRITORIO ANCESTRAL DE LA SNSM; por tanto,no son objeto de consulta99
4. CONSIDERACIONES GENERALES SOBRE LOS PROYECTOS, OBRAS, ACTIVIDADES QUE NO SON PERMITIDOS Y POR TANTO NO SON CONSULTABLES DENTRO DE LA SNSM.101
5. LO QUE PUEDE SER CONSULTADO -Temas que pueden ser objeto de consulta para el Pueblo Arhuacobajo procedimientos adecuados y definidos por la consulta ancestral desde La Ley de Origen-.102
V. PROCEDIMIENTO PARA EL PROCESO DE CONSULTA CON EL PUEBLO ARHUACO–de las medidas, obras, proyectos y actividades consultables-104
A. ACERCAMIENTO PRELIMINAR7-Diálogo interculturalpara el entendimiento entre las partes -105
1. PRESENTACIÓN DE LOS INTERESADOS Y SUS ANTECEDENTES106
2. PRESENTACIÓN DEL PROTOCOLO AUTÓNOMO DEL PUEBLO ARHUACOA LOS TERCEROS interesados en intervenir en el territorio o adoptar medidas que afecten los derechos del Pueblo Arhuaco107
3. PRESENTACIÓNPRELIMINAR DE LA MEDIDA, OBRA, PROYECTO O ACTIVIDAD POR PARTE DE LOS TERCEROS INTERESADOS108
4. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA PROPUESTA, OBRA, PROYECTO O ACTIVIDAD COMO UN TEMA CONSULTABLE Y DECLARACIÓN DE LA VIABILIDAD DE LA CONSULTA108
5. ESTUDIO DE IMPACTOS AMBIENTALES, CULTURALES, ESPIRITUALES,ECONOMICOS Y SOCIALESDE LA OBRA, PROYECTO, ACTIVIDAD O MEDIDA ADMINISTRATIVA.-Concepto Autónomo-109
6. SOCIALIZACION DE LOS POSIBLES DAÑOS, AFECTACIONES DE LA MEDIDA,OBRA, PROYECTO O ACTIVIDADY ESTRATEGIASDE MITIGACIONIDENTIFICADOSPOR PARTE DE LOS TERCEREOS INTERESADOS110
7. DECISION DE VIABILIDAD AMBIENTAL Y CULTURAL DELA OBRA, PROYECTO O ACTIVIDAD DEACUERDO CON RESULTADOS DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTOS.–Consentimiento u objeción cultural-112
B. REALIZACION DE LA CONSULTA ANCESTRALEINTERNA DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO; -procedimiento autónomo para la consulta interna y paso previo a la consultaexternacon el gobierno y a la relación con los terceros-113
1. LA CONSULTA ANCESTRAL–Primer paso parala toma de decisiones-113
2. LA CONSULTA INTERNA DEL PUEBLO ARHUACO114
3. LA CONSULTA INTERNA DE PROYECTOS QUE AFECTAN A LOS CUATRO PUEBLOS DE LA SIERRA NEVADADE SANTA MARTA115
C. CONSENTIMIENTO PARA DAR INICIO AL PROCESO DE CONSULTA EXTERNA–Sobre los aspectos operativos de la medida, obra, proyecto o actividad a realizar-117
D. PARTICIPANTES DEL PUEBLO ARHUACOEN EL PROCESO DE CONSULTA EXTERNA118
E. LA PRE –CONSULTA. 119
F. REALIZACION DE LA CONSULTA EXTERNA, con las instancias del Gobierno Nacionaly con los tercerosinteresados.119
1. CONSIDERACIONES GENERALES.119
2. PROCEDIMIENTO PARA LA REALIZACIÓN DE LA CONSULTA EXTERNA121
3. SOCIALIZACIÓN, ANÁLISIS Y CONCERTACIONDE ESTRATEGIAS FRENTE A LOS DAÑOS,IMPACTOS Y AFECTACIONESA LOS DERECHOS DEL PUEBLO ARHUACODE LA SIERRA NEVADADE SANTA MARTA121
VI. CONSULTA EXTERNA PARA MEDIDAS ADMINISTRATIVAS Y LEGISLATIVAS.–la participación en las instancias nacionales-122
VII. DECLARACION DE CONSENTIMIENTO9PARA DAR INICIO AL PROYECTO, OBRA, ACTIVIDAD O MEDIDA LEGISLATIVA O ADMINISTRATIVA10124
A. CONCERTACIÓN DE LOS ACUERDOS PARA DECLARACION DEL CONSENTIMIENTO124
VIII. ESTRATEGIAS TRANSVERSALES;-SEGUIMIENTO, ASESORIAS Y ACOMPAÑAMIENTO-. -Garantías técnicas y políticas enla relación con los terceros enel marco de los derechos colectivos de los pueblos-126
B. SEGUIMIENTO DE LOS ACUERDOS ASUMIDOS DURANTE EL PROCESO DE CONSULTA CON EL PUEBLO ARHUACOINCLUYENDO EL ACERCAMIENTO PRELIMINAR5
C. ASESORIAS YACOMPAÑAMIENTOS 129
IX. DISPOSICIONES FINALES.130

PROTOCOLO AUTONOMO PUEBLO ARHUACO

Protocol

Geolocation

Latitude: 10.8292621

Longitude: -73.7010991

: Geolocation

Date: Jun 1, 2017

Source: http://www.hchr.org.co/files/eventos/2017/PROTOCOLO-AUTONOMO-PUEBLO-ARHUACO.pdf

Indigenous people(s)

Arhuaco

Country

Colombia

Context and purpose

a) Pending development projects: Mining, Oil/Gas/ Agribusiness / Hydroelectric Dam or experience with past projects
b) Land demarcation (recognized / partially recognized / pending / no recognition)
c) A component of a broader strategy of governance assertion
d) Historical context (are there general statements that reflect this history and perspective)
e) Addressing inter/intra-community/people divisions or formalizing modalities of cooperation
f) Does the protocol have unique features that reflect the particular communities experience
h) Does the protocol address processes for updating its contents

Community governance

a) Life plans (self-determined development)
b) Territorial plans and boundaries
c) Community resolutions
d) Community governance statutes
e) Community history

Preconditions

b) Formal recognition of indigenous’ rights and governance structures
d) Timing of decisions
e) Assertion of rights in relation to natural resources
f) Concepts defined in the protocol (e.g. integral territory, culture, knowledge, sacred sites…)

Term definitions

Consent
Free
Good faith
Informed
Prior

Non-negotiables

a) Affirmations that relocation is unacceptable
b) Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical
c) Affirmation of the right to decide (language used, yes/no, veto and supporting rationale)
d) Agreement to the protocol as basis for consultations
e) Rejection of development project as exchange for recognition of land rights

Core principles

a) Respect for land rights and indigenous governance
b) Good faith with elaboration of its implications
c) Criteria in relation to timeframes and processes
d) Criteria in relation to indigenous knowledge
e) Basis for right to decide and give or withhold consent
f) Negotiation in certain (or all contexts)
g) Intercultural dialogue

Protocol scope

a) A statement of principles
b) Establishes a process for negotiation of consultation procedures
c) Does it seek to define the entire consultation process
d) Does it address particular activities or is it all encompassing (projects, administrative or legislative measures etc and are these addressed separately?)

Legal frameworks invoked

a) International or regional instruments/jurisprudence
b) National laws/policies/jurisprudence
e) Reference to indigenous justice

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

a) Municipal government
b) Specific ministries
c) NHRIs / Ombudsman
d) International oversight

Internal groups or other peoples

a) Other indigenous communities or peoples
e) Broader society

Scope of consultation

a) Single or multiple communities (of one people, or multiple peoples)

When to consult

a) Triggers for consultation
c) Reference to ESIAs

Roles in decision-making process

a) Role of representatives
b) Role of community members
c) The role of General Assemblies and other structures
e) The process of decision-making, discussion, consensus, voting.
f) What is done in the absence of consensus
g) Participation of outsiders

Conditions for consultation

a) Location of meetings
b) Dates that coincides with community activities/calendar
c) Language of consultations and choice of translators
f) Who will coordinate the meetings
g) Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists
h) Actor how pasts costs for participation

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

a) Involvement in strategic planning
b) Initial approach
d) Information meetings (content, where, with whom and partner participation)
e) Internal meetings (actors involved, decision-making processes)
f) Follow up meetings (for additional information)
h) Does it establish fixed timeframes

Language, naming and style

b) as well as the language of the State
c) are there any statements or terms in native language in the dominant language version
d) Is it referred to as a “protocol” ?
g) Is the style western legalistic
h) Is it a hybrid of customary law and western law

Who to consult

a) Elders
c) Leaders
g) Organizations

Outcomes

b) Conditions for agreements
c) Content of agreements
d) Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms

Issued by

Arhuaco

Primary Documents

PROTOCOLO-AUTONOMO-PUEBLO-ARHUACO.pdf
spanish
Download View

A statement of principles

Scope of protocol

Reference to indigenous justice or ancestral justice

Legal framework invoked

Negotiation in certain or all contexts

Core principles

Municipal government

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

International or regional instruments/jurisprudence

Legal framework invoked

International or regional instruments/jurisprudence

Legal framework invoked

Land demarcation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Process for updating the protocol

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Historical context

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Historical context

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Community history

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Historical context

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Pending development projects or experience with past projects

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Fixed timeframes

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Respect for land rights and indigenous governance

Core principles

Land demarcation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Concepts defined in the protocol

Precondition

Community governance statutes

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Community governance statutes

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Concepts defined in the protocol

Precondition

Inter/intra-community/people divisions or formalizing modalities of cooperation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Inter/intra-community/people divisions or formalizing modalities of cooperation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Inter/intra-community/people divisions or formalizing modalities of cooperation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Inter/intra-community/people divisions or formalizing modalities of cooperation

Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance

Intercultural dialogue

Core principles

Criteria in relation to indigenous knowledge

Core principles

Assertion of rights in relation to natural resources

Precondition

Territorial plans and boundaries

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Assertion of rights in relation to natural resources

Precondition

Criteria in relation to indigenous knowledge

Core principles

Community resolutions

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Affirmations that relocation is unacceptable

Non-negociables

Respect for land rights and indigenous governance

Core principles

Respect for land rights and indigenous governance

Core principles

Criteria in relation to timeframes and processes

Core principles

Rejection of development project as exchange for recognition of land rights

Non-negociables

Prior

Definition

Prior

Definition

Criteria in relation to indigenous knowledge

Core principles

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Broader society

Internal groups or other peoples

Single or multiple communities

Scope of consultation

Single or multiple communities

Scope of consultation

What is done in the absence of consensus

Roles in decision-making process

Life plans (self-determined development)

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Life plans (self-determined development)

Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history

Other indigenous communities or peoples

Internal groups or other peoples

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical

Non-negociables

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Seeks to define the entire consultation process

Scope of protocol

Process for negotiation of consultation procedures

Scope of protocol

Good faith with elaboration of its implications

Core principles

Initial approach

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Initial approach

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Formal recognition of indigenous’ rights and governance structures

Precondition

Good faith

Definition

Informed

Definition

Good faith with elaboration of its implications

Core principles

Agreement to the protocol as basis for consultations

Non-negociables

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Intercultural dialogue

Core principles

Intercultural dialogue

Core principles

Informed

Definition

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Reference to ESIAs

When to consult

Reference to ESIAs

When to consult

Reference to ESIAs

When to consult

Informed

Definition

Reference to ESIAs

When to consult

Actor who pays costs for participation

Conditions for consultation

Prior

Definition

Free

Definition

Informed

Definition

Consent

Definition

Internal meetings (actors involved, decision-making processes)

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Dates that coincide with community activities/calendar

Conditions for consultation

Elders

Who to consult

Process of decision-making, discussion, consensus, voting.

Roles in decision-making process

Other indigenous communities or peoples

Internal groups or other peoples

Other indigenous communities or peoples

Internal groups or other peoples

Role of General Assemblies and other structures

Roles in decision-making process

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Role of representatives

Roles in decision-making process

Role of General Assemblies and other structures

Roles in decision-making process

Role of community members

Roles in decision-making process

Actor who pays costs for participation

Conditions for consultation

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Who will coordinate the meetings

Conditions for consultation

Fixed timeframes

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Location of meetings

Conditions for consultation

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Triggers for consultation

When to consult

Conditions for agreements

Outcomes

When is a consultation invalid

Conditions invalidating consultations

When is a consultation invalid

Conditions invalidating consultations

Triggers for consultation

When to consult

Conditions for agreements

Outcomes

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

International oversight

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Location of meetings

Conditions for consultation

Dates that coincide with community activities/calendar

Conditions for consultation

Fixed timeframes

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Timing of decisions

Precondition

Information meetings (content, where, with whom and partner participation)

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Basis for right to decide and give or withhold consent

Core principles

Consent

Definition

Basis for right to decide and give or withhold consent

Core principles

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Actor who pays costs for participation

Conditions for consultation

Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms

Outcomes

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Addresses particular activities or is all encompassing

Scope of protocol

Consent

Definition

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Content of agreements

Outcomes

Content of agreements

Outcomes

Specific ministries

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

NHRIs / Ombudsman

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

Involvement in strategic planning

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Follow up meetings (for additional information)

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms

Outcomes

Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists

Conditions for consultation

Participation of outsiders

Roles in decision-making process

Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists

Conditions for consultation

Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists

Conditions for consultation

Issued by1
- Indigenous People1
Definition4
- Definition4
About142
- Context, purpose and process of protocol creation & maintenance11
- Community governance instruments, structures, territories, history7
- Precondition6
- Non-negociables15
- Core principles15
- Scope of protocol12
- Legal framework invoked3
- Interfaces with external institutions and organizations17
- Internal groups or other peoples4
- Scope of consultation2
- Who to consult1
- Roles in decision-making process7
- Conditions for consultation11
- Nature and sequencing of consultation phases9
- Definition8
- Conditions invalidating consultations2
- When to consult6
- Outcomes6

Create Reference

Select relationship type

in Conflict with
allied with
recognized by
Issued by
Representing
About
Definition
concerns

Search Tips

View

Add entities / documents

Search Tips