Previous 30 / 30 Next

Protocolo para la consulta y consentimiento previo libre e informado del Pueblo Negro NorteCaucano de los consejos comunitarios de los municipios de Suárez y Buenos Aires del departamento del Cauca – Febrero de 2014 Entidades Acompañantes. -Asamblea aprobatoria- Defensoría del Pueblo Personería Municipal ONU – DERECHOS HUMANOS Entidad asesora y acompañamiento técnico 30

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

PROTOCOLO PARA LA CONSULTA Y CONSENTIMIENTO PREVIO SUAREZ BUENOS AIRES CAUCA

Protocol

Geolocation

Latitude: 2.3436

Longitude: -76.664

: Geolocation

Date: Feb 20, 2014

Source: http://www.hchr.org.co/files/eventos/2017/PROTOCOLO-PARA-LA-CONSULTA-Y-CONSENTIMIENTO-PREVIO-SUAREZ-BUENOS_AIRES-CAUCA.pdf

Country

South America: Colombia

Context and purpose

d) Historical context (are there general statements that reflect this history and perspective)
g) Does the protocol describe the process for its development
h) Does the protocol address processes for updating its contents

Community governance

a) Life plans (self-determined development)
e) Community history

Preconditions

b) Formal recognition of indigenous’ rights and governance structures
d) Timing of decisions
f) Concepts defined in the protocol (e.g. integral territory, culture, knowledge, sacred sites…)

Term definitions

Consent
Free
Good faith
Informed
Prior

Non-negotiables

a) Affirmations that relocation is unacceptable
b) Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical
d) Agreement to the protocol as basis for consultations

Core principles

b) Good faith with elaboration of its implications
f) Negotiation in certain (or all contexts)
g) Intercultural dialogue

Protocol scope

a) A statement of principles
c) Does it seek to define the entire consultation process
d) Does it address particular activities or is it all encompassing (projects, administrative or legislative measures etc and are these addressed separately?)

Legal frameworks invoked

a) International or regional instruments/jurisprudence
b) National laws/policies/jurisprudence
e) Reference to indigenous justice

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

b) Specific ministries
c) NHRIs / Ombudsman
d) International oversight

Internal groups or other peoples

a) Other indigenous communities or peoples
e) Broader society

Scope of consultation

c) Multiple peoples

When to consult

a) Triggers for consultation
c) Reference to ESIAs

Roles in decision-making process

a) Role of representatives
b) Role of community members
e) The process of decision-making, discussion, consensus, voting.
f) What is done in the absence of consensus
g) Participation of outsiders

Conditions for consultation

b) Dates that coincides with community activities/calendar
c) Language of consultations and choice of translators
f) Who will coordinate the meetings
g) Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists
h) Actor how pasts costs for participation

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

a) Involvement in strategic planning
b) Initial approach
e) Internal meetings (actors involved, decision-making processes)
g) Are there different processes envisaged for different types of projects/proposals
h) Does it establish fixed timeframes

Language, naming and style

d) Is it referred to as a “protocol” ?
g) Is the style western legalistic

Who to consult

a) Elders
c) Leaders
d) Specific roles addressed (e.g. teachers and health workers)
e) Women
g) Organizations

Outcomes

a) Implications of giving or withholding consent
b) Conditions for agreements
c) Content of agreements
d) Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms

Primary Documents

PROTOCOLO-PARA-LA-CONSULTA-Y-CONSENTIMIENTO-PREVIO-SUAREZ-BUENOS_AIRES-CAUCA.pdf
Spanish
Download View