Photo: Noah Jackson l Creating the Ulu Papar biocultural community protocol 143 Agriculture, a key livelihood for the UP community, is limited due to access restrictions to traditional agriculture sites. community with legal tenure of customary lands inside the park, and it was unclear whether the CUZ areas could support their livelihood needs (Pacos, 2004). In 2009, the Sabah Government began the process to nominate the Crocker Range Biosphere Reserve (CRBR), which is a designation under UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme.2 The CRBR would adopt the entire Crocker Range Park (1,400 km 2) as the core zone for strict conservation. Areas adjacent to the boundary would form the buffer zone, where limited activities would be permitted.3 A transition zone would encircle the buffer zone, where conservation activities and mixed development, such as housing and commercial estates, roads and infrastructure, would be permitted. Ulu Papar falls under both buffer and transition zones, while the CUZ would be implemented as an exemption within the core zone. Poten- tially impacting over 400 villages on the park periphery, the CRBR is still at a conceptual phase and community consultations are still preliminary. Then in 2009, the Sabah State Government announced plans to build the Kaiduan Dam, to supply water to the capital. The project would impound 320ha of Ulu Papar as a catchment area and submerge the villages of Timpayasa, Tiku, Buayan and Babagon Laut (adjacent to Ulu Papar). The project met with public outrage when it claimed the Ulu Papar valley was uninhabited. Although the plans pose immediate and obvious contradictions to the government’s plans to nominate the CRBR, the status of the dam project remains unknown. The Ulu Papar community vehemently oppose the dam. However, their complete lack of tenure security means they have no legal foundation for rejecting the proposed dam. Collaborative research in Ulu Papar In 2004, spurred by interest in Sabah Parks to find innovative solutions to the Ulu Papar conflict, a consortium of partners initiated a joint research project to investigate and document resource use patterns in Ulu Papar. 4 A participatory action research approach was designed to build the capacity of indigenous community researchers to document the key ethnobiological resources important for community livelihoods and jointly monitor how they are used, managed and protected by the community (GDF, 2009). 5 The term 2 The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme aims to set a scientific basis for the improvement of the relationships between people and their environment globally. See: http://tinyurl.com/unesco-mab 3 Existing legislation in force on State lands may place limitations on communities in buffer zones, for example prohibitions on hunting and restrictions in watershed areas. 4 Led by the Global Diversity Foundation (GDF), Sabah Parks and the Ulu Papar community, and funded by the Darwin Initiative UK, this eight-year initiative has, over the years, included partners such as Pacos Trust, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Sabah and the University of Kent UK. 5 Research to collect baseline data (e.g. locations of important areas, key resources important for livelihoods) was a necessary first step for communities to voice their concerns and expectations. The data amassed from this research is vital to building a convincing and realistic proposal to resolve access, use and tenure issues, understanding the resource use and cultural significance of the Ulu Papar landscape so that discussions could focus on practicable solutions and realistic expectations.

Select target paragraph3