l Community protocols and free, prior informed consent – overview and lessons learnt 39 Harry Jonas and Holly Shrumm Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities and the Environment 479 Jalan Sang Kancil Kota Kinabalu 88000 Sabah Malaysia Email: harry@naturaljustice.org Email: holly@naturaljustice.org Wim Hiemstra ETC COMPAS PO Box 64 Kastanjelaan 5 3830 AB Leusden The Netherlands Email: w.hiemstra@etcnl.nl Website: www.compasnet.org María Julia Oliva Senior Advisor on Access and Benefit-Sharing Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT) Keizergracht 158 1015 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands Email: julia@ethicalbiotrade.org Website: www.ethicalbiotrade.org REFERENCES Note: references without dates refer to articles published in this issue ANDES, the Potato Park Communities and IIED (2011) Community biocultural protocols: building mechanisms for access and benefitsharing among the communities of the Potato Park based on Quechua customary norms. Online: http://pubs.iied.org/G03168.html Cabrera J, F. Perron-Welch and O. Rukundo (2011) Overview of national and regional measures on access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing: challenges and opportunities in implementing the Nagoya Protocol. Centre for International Sustainable Development Law: Canada. Colchester, M. (2010) Free, prior and informed consent: making FPIC work for forests and people. The Forest Dialogue Research Paper 11. COMPAS (2010) ‘Bio-cultural community protocols enforce biodiversity benefits: a selection of cases and experiences.’ Endogenous Development Magazine. FAO (2007) State of the world’s animal genetic resources. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.

Select target paragraph3