Previous 61 / 94 Next

CABILDO INDÍGENA DE LA COMUNIDAD CERRO TIJERAS-MUNICIPIO DE SUAREZ (cauca) NIT: 817007491-9 Reconocida por la dirección de asuntos indígenas, minorías Étnicas y ROM. Ministerio del Interior y Justicia. Resolución No. 00155 del 22 de octubre del 2010 Suarez Cauca, Diagonal al Hospital, Barrio la Esperanza Suarez cauca – Colombia comunidadcerrotijeras@hotmail.com PROTOCOLO DE RELACIONAMIENTO BASE PARA LA CONSULTA Y EL CONSENTIMIENTO PREVIO LIBRE E INFORMADO dialogará con la autoridad de los otros Pueblos para llegar a un consenso en torno a la protección de los derechos y del territorio, antes del diálogo intercultural o consulta con los externos. (5) Acuerdos Sobre los procedimientos a seguir en la consulta externa  Los Pueblos afectados por el mismo proyecto que no lleguen a un acuerdo a través de sus autoridades, no procederán a la consulta externa hasta que haya un acuerdo mínimo o básico sobre la prevención de los daños ambientales, la integridad cultural de los Pueblos y sus comunidades, el respeto de la naturaleza y la jurisdicción de los Pueblos. 61

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

PROTOCOLO CP Y CPLI DEL PUEBLO NASA CERRO TIJERAS

Protocol

Geolocation

Latitude: 2.3751

Longitude: -76.7436

: Geolocation

Date: Mar 31, 2017

Source: http://www.hchr.org.co/files/eventos/2017/PROTOCOLO-CP-Y-CPLI-DEL-PUEBLO-NASA-CERRO-TIJERAS.pdf

Indigenous people(s)

Nasa / Paez

Country

South America: Colombia

Context and purpose

c) A component of a broader strategy of governance assertion
g) Does the protocol describe the process for its development
h) Does the protocol address processes for updating its contents

Community governance

a) Life plans (self-determined development)
b) Territorial plans and boundaries
e) Community history

Preconditions

b) Formal recognition of indigenous’ rights and governance structures
c) Addressing of legacy issues
d) Timing of decisions
e) Assertion of rights in relation to natural resources

Term definitions

Free
Informed
Prior

Non-negotiables

a) Affirmations that relocation is unacceptable
f) Circumstances that render consultations or consent void (e.g. creation of division, presence of armed groups, offers of money, threats…)

Core principles

b) Good faith with elaboration of its implications
f) Negotiation in certain (or all contexts)

Protocol scope

a) A statement of principles
c) Does it seek to define the entire consultation process
d) Does it address particular activities or is it all encompassing (projects, administrative or legislative measures etc and are these addressed separately?)

Legal frameworks invoked

e) Reference to indigenous justice

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations

a) Municipal government
d) International oversight

Internal groups or other peoples

a) Other indigenous communities or peoples

Scope of consultation

a) Single or multiple communities (of one people, or multiple peoples)

When to consult

a) Triggers for consultation
b) Reference to specific activities
c) Reference to ESIAs

Roles in decision-making process

a) Role of representatives
b) Role of community members
c) The role of General Assemblies and other structures
d) The role of leaders or chiefs in determining where and when assemblies are held
e) The process of decision-making, discussion, consensus, voting.
g) Participation of outsiders

Conditions for consultation

a) Location of meetings
f) Who will coordinate the meetings
h) Actor how pasts costs for participation

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases

b) Initial approach
e) Internal meetings (actors involved, decision-making processes)
i) Rituals addressed

Language, naming and style

b) as well as the language of the State
d) Is it referred to as a “protocol” ?
g) Is the style western legalistic

Who to consult

g) Organizations

Outcomes

b) Conditions for agreements
d) Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms

Issued by

Nasa / Paez

Primary Documents

PROTOCOLO-CP-Y-CPLI-DEL-PUEBLO-NASA-CERRO-TIJERAS.pdf
Spanish
Download View