Indigenous Peoples FPIC Protocols

Indigenous Peoples FPIC Protocols

- Library
- Sign in

Search Tips

sorted by

Title
Date added
Date modified

Cards view Table view Map view

3 shown of 3 entities

PROTOCOLO BUENAVENTURA

Source: http://www.hchr.org.co/files/eventos/201...

Date added: Oct 16, 2018

Protocol

PROTOCOLO CP Y CPLI DEL PUEBLO NASA CERRO TIJERAS

Source: http://www.hchr.org.co/files/eventos/201...

Date added: Oct 16, 2018

Protocol

Bio cultural protocol ASOCASAN 2012

Source: http://www.pnuma.org/publicaciones/PCB%2...

Date added: Oct 16, 2018

Protocol

3 shown of 3 entities

Uwazi is developed by
Indigenous Peoples FPIC Protocols
Library
Login

Filters

- Document type3
  - Protocol 3
  - Court ruling 0
  - Report 0
  - Guidance 0
  - Regulation 0
  - Official documents 0
- Protocol contents0
- Group, person or organisation0

Sector
ANDOR
- No Label 3

Country
ANDOR
- South America 3

Context and purpose
ANDOR
- c) A component of a broader strategy of governance assertion 3
- g) Does the protocol describe the process for its development 3
- b) Land demarcation (recognized / partially recognized / pending / no recognition) 2
- d) Historical context (are there general statements that reflect this history and perspective) 2
- h) Does the protocol address processes for updating its contents 2
- f) Does the protocol have unique features that reflect the particular communities experience 1

Community governance
ANDOR
- e) Community history 3
- a) Life plans (self-determined development) 2
- d) Community governance statutes 2
- b) Territorial plans and boundaries 1

Preconditions
ANDOR
- c) Addressing of legacy issues 3
- b) Formal recognition of indigenous’ rights and governance structures 9
- e) Assertion of rights in relation to natural resources 8
- f) Concepts defined in the protocol (e.g. integral territory, culture, knowledge, sacred sites…) 6
- d) Timing of decisions 3
- No Label 34

Term definitions
ANDOR
- Free 3
- Informed 3
- Prior 3
- Good faith 2
- Consent 1

Non-negotiables
ANDOR
- a) Affirmations that relocation is unacceptable 3
- b) Rejection certain types of activities / impacts that are critical 2
- c) Affirmation of the right to decide (language used, yes/no, veto and supporting rationale) 2
- d) Agreement to the protocol as basis for consultations 2
- f) Circumstances that render consultations or consent void (e.g. creation of division, presence of armed groups, offers of money, threats…) 1

Core principles
ANDOR
- f) Negotiation in certain (or all contexts) 3
- a) Respect for land rights and indigenous governance 2
- b) Good faith with elaboration of its implications 2
- e) Basis for right to decide and give or withhold consent 1
- g) Intercultural dialogue 1

Protocol scope
ANDOR
- a) A statement of principles 3
- c) Does it seek to define the entire consultation process 3
- d) Does it address particular activities or is it all encompassing (projects, administrative or legislative measures etc and are these addressed separately?) 3

Legal frameworks invoked
ANDOR
- a) International or regional instruments/jurisprudence 2
- b) National laws/policies/jurisprudence 2
- e) Reference to indigenous justice 2
- d) Customary law 1

Interfaces with external institutions and organizations
ANDOR
- a) Municipal government 3
- b) Specific ministries 2
- d) International oversight 2
- c) NHRIs / Ombudsman 1

Internal groups or other peoples
ANDOR
- a) Other indigenous communities or peoples 2
- f) Deceased ancestors or spirits 1
- No Label 1

Scope of consultation
ANDOR
- a) Single or multiple communities (of one people, or multiple peoples) 2
- No Label 1

When to consult
ANDOR
- a) Triggers for consultation 2
- b) Reference to specific activities 2
- c) Reference to ESIAs 2
- No Label 1

Roles in decision-making process
ANDOR
- a) Role of representatives 2
- b) Role of community members 2
- c) The role of General Assemblies and other structures 2
- d) The role of leaders or chiefs in determining where and when assemblies are held 2
- e) The process of decision-making, discussion, consensus, voting. 2
- f) What is done in the absence of consensus 1
- g) Participation of outsiders 1
- No Label 1

Conditions for consultation
ANDOR
- h) Actor how pasts costs for participation 2
- a) Location of meetings 1
- f) Who will coordinate the meetings 1
- g) Freedom to invite third parties, including trusted specialists 1
- i) Absence of armed presence in the meetings (police, security or intelligence) 1
- No Label 1

Nature and sequencing of consultation phases
ANDOR
- b) Initial approach 2
- e) Internal meetings (actors involved, decision-making processes) 2
- a) Involvement in strategic planning 1
- d) Information meetings (content, where, with whom and partner participation) 1
- h) Does it establish fixed timeframes 1
- i) Rituals addressed 1
- No Label 1

Language, naming and style
ANDOR
- b) as well as the language of the State 3
- d) Is it referred to as a “protocol” ? 3
- g) Is the style western legalistic 2
- f) Does it include quotes from community members or leaders 1

Who to consult
ANDOR
- a) Elders 1
- c) Leaders 1
- e) Women 1
- g) Organizations 1

Outcomes
ANDOR
- b) Conditions for agreements 2
- d) Agreement oversight and enforcement mechanisms 2
- a) Implications of giving or withholding consent 1
- c) Content of agreements 1
- No Label 1

Actors addressed
ANDOR
- No Label 3

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Table of contents

No Table of Contents

Table of Contents allows users to navigate easier throught the document.

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Relationships

Relationships are bonds between entities.

0 selected

Upload a ZIP or CSV file. Import instructions

File

Template