15 B. WHY ARE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPING AND USING PROTOCOLS? B1. External Threats Communities are documenting, developing, and using protocols primarily in response to external threats and challenges caused by global demand for increasingly scarce natural resources. Many of these resources are in the customary territories and areas of Indigenous peoples and local communities and have been conserved and sustainably used as forests,  Clear-cut logging watersheds, rangelands, mountains, and coral reefs.  Monoculture plantations such as soy and As a result, communities’ territories and areas often oil palm become the targets of land and resource acquisition  Bottom trawling for fish and crustaceans for external gains.  Large-scale aquaculture  Mining and drilling for minerals, oil, and gas Privatization and nationalization of resources and the  Infrastructure such as dams and use of large-scale, industrial methods of production transportation routes and consumption (see Box 2) are causing rapid rates  Introduction of invasive alien species and of biodiversity loss and ecosystem destruction. genetically-modified plants and animals Combined with social and political threats such as acculturation and discrimination, these  Pollution and industrial waste environmental pressures significantly affect  Human-induced natural disasters Indigenous peoples and local communities who  Strictly protected areas such as national depend upon their territories and areas for parks and nature reserves livelihoods and wellbeing. As a result, cultural and linguistic diversity are declining at alarming rates as Box 2: Examples of external threats to Indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ territories and areas well. Perhaps at the heart of these issues is the nature of law itself. Laws compartmentalize parts of the environment and of communities’ lives that are inseparable in reality. Indigenous peoples and local communities tend to view their territories and areas as integrated systems, with each part dependent upon others. In contrast, governments tend to view an area solely as distinct parts. They develop and implement multiple laws that separately address, for example, biodiversity, forests, water, wildlife, agriculture, and Indigenous knowledge. The result is the legal fragmentation of communities’ ways of life, which can weaken their claims to self-determination. For more information about critiques of the nature of law and its impacts on communities, please see www.community-protocols.org/context Key Resources on External Threats to Communities’ Territories and Areas Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010) Land Rights and the Rush for Land: Findings of the Global Commercial Pressures on Land Research Project (International Land Coalition, 2012) Land Deals in Africa: What is in the Contracts? (IIED, 2011) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Extractive Industries Operating Within or Near Indigenous Territories (Anaya, 2011) Pushback: Local Power, Global Realignment (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2011)

Select target paragraph3