Three key observations emerge from this matrix:
There is no common model or ‘one best way’ for consultation. The First Nation
guidelines and protocols exhibit a number of differences in both areas of emphasis
and level of comprehensiveness in how they approach consultation.
While the guidelines and protocols differ in their areas of emphasis, there certain
priority issues can be identified. All of the guides address the issues of
consultation principles. Six of the seven examples deal with consultation
procedures and steps, or with resources and funding.
There is variability in the configuration of different elements. There are no
patterns in the mix of elements across guidelines or protocols. Two of the
guidelines incorporate all six elements, while four others address only three,
differing elements. As a result, each guideline is unique, reflecting particular
purposes or priorities.
These observations lead to the following conclusions.
All of the topics are potentially relevant and important for First Nations preparing
for consultation.
Certain topics are likely to be important in all situations related to preparing First
Nations for consultation. These include understanding the principles of
consultation, and understanding consultation procedures and steps as well as
issues relating to resources and funding. .
Defining the particular mix of elements that is relevant depends on the situation.
Many different models and configurations are possible. The key to success is first,
understanding the different potential elements, and then selecting those that are
appropriate to the specific situation and the goals of the consultation process.