52 C. LEGAL EMPOWERMENT, SOCIAL MOBILIZATION, AND ADVOCACY Note to community facilitators: This sub-section introduces a number of key tools related to legal empowerment, social mobilization, and advocacy. The tools include:  Identifying appropriate forms of resource mapping  Community biodiversity registers  Participatory video  Photo stories  Audio interviews  Identifying relevant social media tools  E-learning modules on relevant legal frameworks  Legislative theatre  Principles for public participation in impact assessments With a foundation of endogenous development and multi-stakeholder partnerships, a biocultural community protocol is brought to life through an integrated process of legal empowerment, social mobilization, and advocacy. Overall, this process aims to empower communities to use legal tools to tackle power asymmetries and take greater control over the decisions and processes that affects their ways of life and territories and areas upon which they depend. As described in Part I: Section II/B1, the law disaggregates the environment into distinct compartments. This directly conflicts with the otherwise interconnected manner in which communities interact with their territories and areas. However, laws and policies can be changed, as exemplified by global movements to realize the rights and responsibilities of farmers, livestock keepers, fish workers, and forest peoples. With innovation and determination, Indigenous peoples and local communities around the world are reimagining and recreating the law in accordance with their worldviews, ways of life, and customary laws. In this sense, they are breaking the regrettable legal tradition of either being ‘spoken at’ or ‘spoken for’. They are also proving that formal training as a lawyer is not necessary to effectively engage with the law. Legal empowerment is based on the twin principles that law should not remain a monopoly of trained professionals and that alternative forms of dispute resolution (such as dialogues) are often more attuned to local realities than formal legal processes. Ideally, the act of using the law becomes as empowering as the outcome of the process itself. For example, a court victory that sets a legal precedent can be supremely useful. However, a process driven by the community itself through internal organization and strategic action will likely be far more powerful. Thus the potential of a biocultural community protocol to bring about tangible change is dependent upon how the community undertakes processes of learning about the law and how to interpret and use it, mobilizing social movements, and advocating for change. Key Resources on Legal Empowerment Biocultural Community Protocols and Conservation Pluralism (Jonas et al., 2010) Making the Law Work for Everyone, Volume I: Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor and Volume II: Technical Reports (UNDP, 2008) Legal Empowerment Working Papers and Legal Empowerment: Practitioners’ Perspectives (IDLO, 2010) Traditional Justice: Practitioners’ Perspectives (IDLO site) Legal Empowerment in Practice: Using Legal Tools to Secure Land Rights in Africa (Cotula and Mathieu (Eds.), 2008) Between Law and Society: Paralegals and the Provision of Justice Services in Sierra Leone and Worldwide (Maru, 2006) Indigenous Peoples and Traditional Resource Rights: A Basis for Equitable Relationships? (Posey, 1995) Democratic Dialogue: A Handbook for Practitioners (Pruitt and Thomas, 2007) Haki Network and Namati Network: Innovations in Legal Empowerment Legal Empowerment of the Poor: International Applied Research Learning Network on Poverty and Human Rights

Select target paragraph3