Overall, face-to-face, visual, and/or interactive means of communication are the preferred methods of disseminating research results to community members. Written reports, publications, or summaries can sometimes provide more detail but can be less
effective in northern communities that are built upon oral history and traditions. Furthermore, these diverse means of communication need not be limited to results reporting. Many of the options listed above can also be effective ways to keep
community members informed of each different research stage, as the project progresses. It is important that communication materials be pre-tested prior to
use (for comprehension, appeal, and relevance), and that the effectiveness of communication efforts be systematically evaluated.
Beyond the issue of research reporting format, researchers are asked to review and
consider the most appropriate means, and timing, of results release. Communities should
be informed of project results before they are published in academic or public forums,
especially where the results may be sensitive or controversial. To alleviate any negative
or unintended research findings (e.g. unnecessary community concern or reaction, policies or decisions made from misrepresented results or from misinterpreted information,
etc.), you might ask yourself:
– Are the results of a particular study sensitive? If so, what might be the
local consequences of releasing such project results?
– What are some of the predictable misinterpretations of the research
results, either by the media or locally? How might their misinterpretations have negative consequences for community well-being?
– Who is the most appropriate to report results to the community?
– How can the community be engaged in results evaluation and/or
reporting?
– Are community members given appropriate credit in the research results
and/or publications?
– What are the best ways to ensure that communities and regions can use
the research to their advantage?
Negotiating a Research Relationship
It is important to reflect upon what your research can contribute to community life
or understanding, in addition to the scientific or academic contributions. However, it is
not your sole responsibility to decide if and how your work can be relevant to a particular community.Through a negotiated research relationship, both the researcher and the
community can ensure more responsible, reciprocal, and mutually beneficial research.
A G UIDE F OR R ESEARCHERS
❖
21